Farmers Want Greater NRCS Presence
More than 50 people attended a joint meeting of the Glasscock County Soil and
Water Conservation District and St. Lawrence Cotton Growers Dec. 19 at the
Senior Citizens’ Center in Garden City. The meeting’s purpose was to
consider issues relating to the Natural Resources Conservation Service’s work
in the county.
More than 15 people, mostly cotton producers, described their experiences
and dissatisfactions with the NCRS in recent years. One after another, producers
told of difficulties in trying to get technical help from the NRCS with projects
involving such things as topcon mapping, waterways, water diversion terraces,
drip irrigation and brush control. Their complaints related numerous instances
of unanswered requests for assistance, work promised and not begun, work begun
but not finished, and unreturned telephone messages. Many said their frustration
was such that they had simply stopped asking the NRCS for assistance.
Little
NRCS Involvement
Warren
Multer, Extension Agent for Integrated Pest Management, agreed with several
others who said that 10 years ago, there was NRCS help, cooperation and support
in Glasscock County, but now, he said, the agency is not very involved here.
Multer
said the county’s farmers and livestock producers are progressive and
interested in new methods of soil and water conservation, and should be given
help in their conservation efforts. He and Extension Agent for Agriculture Steve
Sturtz both called for cooperation among government agencies in order to best
help producers.
NRCS
Assistant State Conservationist for Field Operations Elisha Kuehn, and Natural
Resources Team Leader Gary Grogan, responded to the speakers’ concerns.
Kuehn said most of the problems are because 1) the NRCS is understaffed
and 2) USDA Program work, which is mandated by Congress, gets highest priority.
(Program work includes CRP, EQUIP, and CCRP.) She cited the agency’s
downsizing in recent years, and said her area of supervision now encompasses 51
counties and includes 76 employees, 4 of whom are engineers. She said a team of
5 employees, including one engineer, services Tom Green, Coke, Sterling and
Glasscock counties.
Workload
Dictates Staffing
Kuehn said workload dictates staffing in the NRCS, and Glasscock
County’s workload, as it is recorded in her office, has not warranted more
staff here. Producers say the actual workload is more than sufficient, but that
it doesn’t show up in NRCS records because they are doing most of the work
themselves.
Grogan said producers should apply for any NRCS programs for which they
qualify, and should ask for NRCS assistance where it is applicable. He also said
producers should ask their elected state and national representatives to support
their efforts. He said, “If you don’t ask, you never get a damned thing.”
Attempting to find ways to improve the local situation, Kuehn said that
if Glasscock County would provide office space and utilities, she would send one
of the people from the Sterling City NRCS office to Glasscock County for an
undetermined number of days weekly, if there is enough workload to justify it.
Kuehn said she also would look into getting a toll-free telephone number for the
Sterling City office. She said locating a full-time office here would take USDA
or congressional approval.
Educational
Meetings Promised
Kuehn also said the NRCS would conduct educational meetings in Glasscock
County, beginning in January or February, in order to inform producers about
what types of programs and assistance the agency offers. (See “Briefly,”
page 2.)
According to Kuehn, complaints, concerns or comments regarding NRCS
service should be directed to Grogan at 915/655-3521,
ext. 3 or to her at 915/944-0147. The NRCS
accountability website is: www.nrcs.usda.gov/prms.